Economic “Perfect Storms” in the Wake of the Silver Tsunami

By Chris Orestis

There are two inextricably linked fundamentals that determine the quality of life for Baby Boomers and Seniors: health and finances. As they age and life expectancies compress, there is less time and vitality available to recover from injury and illness. The same is true of financial “vitality”. People in their thirties and forties have time to recover from set backs in the stock market, housing values, or business and investment fluctuations. Once people reach their sixties, it is too late to start a meaningful savings program (as the benefits of compound interest have long since abated) and if investments and/or property are underperforming there may be little time available to wait for recovery.

Retirements funded by a corporate pension after a life time of service are almost extinct in this country. Beyond Social Security and Medicare, the vast majority of Americans today rely on equity in their homes to be a major component of their retirement. For seniors facing major costs such as health care and long term care, the current state of the economy could not be worse. The impact of the sub-prime mortgage implosion on credit and equities markets has resulted in a huge hit on many American’s net worth via erosion in home equity. In fact the National Association of Home Builders released a report in June of 2008 citing that, $426 billion of equity in the U.S. has vanished. That is almost half a TRILLION dollars taken away from Americans in less than two years!

During an interview with former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan in July, 2008 he was quoted as saying that the U.S. housing market is nowhere near the bottom and that our economy is teetering on the brink of recession. He described the confluence of economic factors currently battering the U.S. a once in a century “phenomenon”. Validating his concerns is the most recent reports released on foreclosures showing a 55% increase from July of 2007 to July of 2008. That translates into 1 in every 464 households in this country foreclosed in July, 2008. Maybe even more alarming is the 184% increase in bank repossessions during the same time period. The top states in the country for foreclosures is Nevada, California, Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, Colorado, Utah, Virginia, Texas, Illinois, and New York.

When Greenspan talks about this “phenomenon” he is talking about the combination of the real estate woes and the alarming pace of inflation in core areas such as food and fuel costs. The impact of these two areas has been causing huge swings on an almost daily basis in the stock market furthering adding to people’s concerns. Energy prices are up almost 30% for the year and food prices have increased 6%. Even with recent declines in oil prices and a drop at the fuel pump, oil prices are still double what they were in the summer of 2007 and grain prices are double what they were in the summer of 2006.

The impact that this is having on seniors is very serious. Home equity is in reverse and savings and equities are being chewed up by inflation and stock market volatility. Social programs such as Social Security are not doing much better with the smallest benefit increase in the last four years at 2.3% for 2008. According to the AARP, the number of seniors filing for bankruptcy over the age of 55 in the last year was about 250,000. At this pace, the recent study by Ernst & Young LLP showing that three out of every five new middle class retirees will outlive their financial assets if they do not downwardly adjust their standard of living (expenses) by 24%-37% looks to be optimistic.

During good times, equity in homes and the growth of the stock market can propel a high standard of living in retirement and also help to fund the expenses associated with health care and long term care. But during hard times, when these critical economic engines are not cooperating the outlook can change drastically.

Long Term Care Crisis

The double-edged sword of the senior market is the long term care crisis. Everyone will eventually need to secure some form of long term care and/or assisted living, but no one likes to think about it today and making plans for the future is easily put off until later. In fact, the long term care crisis in the United States is a lot like global warming. There is no denying it is happening and that you are going to be impacted—but it seems like it is far enough away into an uncertain future that today’s needs and priorities take precedence. As is usually the case with the human condition, we seldom plan for a crisis and instead are forced to react to it when it is upon us. One study on how seniors make choices about senior residential and long term care options showed three distinct and familiar patterns:

13% actively plan for retirement and how they will live as they grow older and frailer
40% actively plan following a “near catastrophic” health event such as total joint replacement or extended illness
46+% never plan and must make decisions about site of care in a very short period of time, usually while still in the hospital

Currently in the U.S. there are over 1.5 million people living in nursing homes. Of that population, 72% are female and the 85+ population is growing the fastest with a 20% increase. The oldest old are living longer and they are costing more than ever to support with private or public funds. This is important to consider when planning for the future because as of today, 56% of residents will live in a nursing home anywhere from one to five years or more (with a national average of 30 months).

For the population of 900,000 people currently living in assisted living facilities, the vast majority of financing is private pay. In addition to the monthly cost for a room, apartment or cottage; residents may also face one-time entrance fees ranging from $60,000-$350,000 for higher end “resort style” or “cottage” properties. Additional monthly fees ranging from $348-$522 are often times charged for transportation, dementia care, meal delivery to residence, and other extras that would add to quality of life.

With the reality of escalating costs and the growing senior population; we will see increasing pressure on publicly funded programs such as Medicare and Medicaid (which combined pays for roughly 80% all long term care related expenses in the U.S.), and moves to make it more difficult to qualify. The economic squeeze of inflation, the real estate crisis and stock market performance are all contributing to declines in tax revenues for the states. When taxes shrink one of the most vulnerable areas is also one of the most expensive for state budgets: Medicaid and other social support programs. The long term care industry and the government at all levels are in agreement on how to compensate. More emphasis must be placed on the individual to pay for as much care and housing as possible with private funds before any public funds are made available. But what are some private funding options that people should be considering?

An obvious source of funds to cover these expenses would be from long term care insurance. The only problem is that attractive tax deductions have never been established to incentivize growth in the market, and it has been stalled for over a decade. As of today, long term care insurance accounts for an anemic single digit percentage of all funding for senior housing and care.

A primary option that people have often looked to is cashing in their home through a sale to raise the funds to sustain themselves (or to meet spend down requirements). But, the current real estate market has taught us, as is the case with the stock market, that it is always vulnerable to a correction. Another means to extract equity from a home could be through a reverse mortgage, and it might be a good option for a home healthcare arrangement, but what happens if health conditions deteriorate rapidly and the person must move into a facility on short notice? The home owner is then faced with the dilemma of funds that can’t be used for a setting outside of the home, and a loan that must be paid back immediately.

If a person has built up cash value in a life insurance policy, they could consider taking a loan against the policy or surrendering it for the cash value. Also, if someone attempts to qualify for Medicaid, a life insurance policy would be an “unprotected” asset subject to the 60 month look back period. It would need to be liquidated and spent down on care before eligibility could begin. According to a Federal Government Accounting Office (GAO) report released to the U.S. Congress in March, 2007: when examining a sample population of over 500 Medicaid applicants entering long term care facilities, 38% owned a life insurance policy that needed to be liquidated because it exceeded minimum state mandated asset levels.

As we all watch the current economic crisis unfold on a daily basis it is important to understand how the value of life insurance policies are affected by these events. The value of a life insurance policy is guaranteed by law. Insurance companies are legally required to maintain enough cash reserves to pay off the death benefit of the policies they issue. Even in the case of AIG, there are enough cash reserves in place to cover all of the company’s outstanding policies. That money can not be touched for any reason other than to cover their active insurance policies. The volatility of the stock market and the drop in real estate values have absolutely no impact on life insurance polices or the reserves put aside to cover them.
According to most economists, this economic crisis could result in a recession that will last well beyond 2009. For most people who own life insurance policies in the U.S. today, it may be the most stable asset they currently own. Their home and stock portfolios may be suffering significant losses in value, but their life insurance policy has not, and will not change in value. The demand for life insurance policies in the Life Settlement market is stronger than ever because insurance polices are disconnected from the economy and their value remains constant despite the current economic turmoil.

When cashing out a life insurance policy, either by choice or because of an eligibility mandate, the superior option is a Life Settlement. This process will ensure that the highest possible value is obtained for the policy through bidding from multiple institutional sources in the secondary market. Also, any tax implications for capital gains realized from a Life Settlement would be offset by deductions based on spending the money for “the entire cost of maintenance in a nursing home or home for the aged” (sec. 1016 U.S. Master Tax Code 2008). The Conning & Co. Research study "Life Settlements: Additional Pressure on Life Profits” found that senior citizens owned approximately $500 billion worth of life insurance in 2003, of which $100 billion was owned by seniors eligible for life settlements. Statistical data gathered on policies “settled” in 2007 continues to verify that the difference between the amounts of money that can be realized through a Life Settlement is significantly greater than through cash “surrender” value. When the time comes to look at funding vehicles to pay for long term care related expenses, cashing in a life insurance policy through a Life Settlement could be an excellent financial move.

** This article consist of excerpted material from the White Paper, The Silver Tsunami by Chris Orestis available on request info@lifecarefunding.com